Join the Fight for Jobs!
Fight for Jobs
  • Home
  • About
    • Maps
    • Register to Vote
    • Contact Us
  • Top Issues
  • Voter Tools
  • Find Your Candidate

Political Bracketology and Final Fours

3/23/2011

0 Comments

 
Stretched across my floor right now is a 20+ category spreadsheet of my state by state analysis of the 112th Congress and the 2011/2012 election environment.  Included in the review are objective quantifiable factors such as outcomes of previous elections, including changes in state legislatures, and the turnover in the congressional delegation.  Other criteria are more subjective regarding one’s projection of competition in upcoming races or the presence of important target audiences.  In addition, I’ve incorporated arguable, definition-dependent ingredients such as the strategic placement of the state’s congressional delegation and presence of centrist, solution-driven members to tackle our business agenda.

No state can be overlooked, whether the motivation for ranking is legislative or political.  This is a complicated exercise because there is political power almost everywhere on the map.  Yes, Michigan has the power on significant committees and is the political equivalent of the Big East.  But Maine and Delaware have two centrist senators, without whom no issue coalition can get a majority.  New Mexico has a Republican Hispanic woman governor.  Hawaii has an open Senate seat.  Every state can argue its role in achieving victory on our cornerstone issues.

Typically, BIPAC’s Prosperity Fund will select about a dozen states for top tier status in the first quarter of the new Congress.  That designation entitles our working partner, state business-based organization to apply for grants to assist them in hiring dedicated staff to work with local business to increase workplace communication on issues, to upgrade their technology infrastructure, and to enhance their messaging tools to engage public officials.  Over 40 states are involved in our network, usually through the state manufacturing or chamber leadership.  Every state in this network has measurable goals of lives touched, messages delivered, voter registration and early voting downloads through BIPAC’s Prosperity Project tools.

In the parlance of the season, here are a few brackets and the final four emerging from the spreadsheet.  Every one of you ought to set up your own decision data points and create your own rankings.  You may be surprised at where your process leads.

  • Presidential:  Bush 2004/Obama 2008 by Closest Margins: Florida, Indiana, North Carolina, Ohio.  These states had 73 Electoral College votes in 2008 and will have 72 in 2012.
  • Governors:  Switched Parties in 2010 by Closest Margins:  Connecticut, Minnesota, Ohio, Vermont
  • Governors:  Expected Competition 2011/2012: Missouri, North Carolina, Washington, West Virginia
  • Senate:  2008 or 2010 Switched Parties by Closest Margins: Illinois, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin
  • Senate:  Expected Competition 2012: Florida, Nevada, Ohio, Virginia
  • House:  Large Delegations at Least 20% Switched Parties: Illinois, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania
  • House:  Reapportionment Gain or Lose Two or More Seats: Florida, New York, Ohio, Texas
  • State Legislature:  Both Houses Switched Party Control 2010: Minnesota, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Wisconsin
  • Delegations:  Newbie-O-Meter: Colorado, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Virginia
  • 112th Congress:  Great Committee Assignments: Michigan, New Jersey, Texas, Washington
  • 112th Congress:  Centrist Delegations: Delaware, Maine, North Carolina, Virginia
  • Overall:  Based on All 20+ Categories: Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Wisconsin
0 Comments

    About Us

    There is a time for politics and a time for governing. The time for politics is over the time for governing is upon us.

    Learn More

    Archives

    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    August 2010

    Categories

    All
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arizona
    Arkansas
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Hawaii
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Iowa
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Maine
    Maryland
    Massachusetts
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Mississippi
    Missouri
    Montana
    Nebraska
    Nevada
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    New Mexico
    New York
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Vermont
    Virginia
    Washington
    West Virginia
    Wisconsin
    Wyoming

    RSS Feed

Fight for Jobs
© 2014 BIPAC. All rights reserved.

Fight for Jobs

> About Fight for Jobs
> Top Issues
> Voter Tools
> Find Your Candidate
> Register to Vote

Connect With Us

> Facebook
> Twitter
> YouTube
> Email

Search Fight For Jobs

Fight for Jobs is a product of:
BIPAC